You Should Know C# IStructuralEquatable Temel Özellikleri Göstergeleri

You Should Know C# IStructuralEquatable Temel Özellikleri Göstergeleri

Blog Article

If equality is not needed for the derived class you güç skip IEquatable but you need to override the CanEqual to prevent it being equal with base classes (unless of course they should be considered equal).

In this case you don't want to change your class implementation so you don't wantoverride the Equals method. this will define a general way to compare objects in your application.

. The best example of this is arrays, which with .Safi 4 now implement the IStructuralEquatable interface. This makes it possible to distinguish whether you are comparing two arrays for reference equality, or for "structural equality" - whether they have the same number of items with the same values in each position. Here's an example:

Default property. The second time, it passes the default equality comparer that is returned by the StructuralComparisons.StructuralEqualityComparer property. The third time, it passes the custom NanComparer object. As the output from the example shows, the first three method calls return true, whereas the fourth call returns false.

In this equating the values in arrays may be same or different but their object references are equal.

comparer IEqualityComparer An object that determines whether the current instance and other are equal.

1 My understanding is that it's used for collection like types, and encapsulates the structural part of the comparison, but leaved the comparison of the elements to a comparer passed in by the user. But I'm not really sure if I really got it.

Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues as the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor new feedback system. For more information see: .

Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues birli the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .

Bu örnekte, articles1 ve articles2 dizileri aynı makale saksılıklarına aynı sırada sahip olduğundan, CompareTo metodu 0 döndürerek bu dizilerin strüktürel olarak eşit olduğunu belirtir.

Each of your objects should use a hashcode based on the contents of the object. If you have a value type containing 3 ints, use those when computing the hash code. Like this, all objects with identical content will have the same hash code, independent of app domain and other circumstances.

The contract of Equals differs from that of IStructuralEquatable, in that it indicates whether 2 objects are logically equal.

Just look at the default ValueType.Equals(object) code that gets called otherwise. It's an absolute performance killer that introduces boxing, type evaluation and finally falls back on reflection if any of the fields are reference types.

Being able to specify IStructuralEquatable/IStructuralComparable in such cases is actually useful. It would also be inconvenient to pass a TupleComparer or ArrayComparer everywhere you want to apply this type of comparison. The two approaches are derece mutually exclusive.